ADVERTISMENT
 
 
17 May 2008

The Theory of Everything

- 6 Jan 2001
By Michio Kaku   
Page 1 of 5

Time Magazine chose him as Man of the Century. Albert Einstein had three great theories. His first theory of Special Relativity (1905) gave us E = mc², which led to the atomic bomb and unlocked the secret of the stars. His second great theory was General Relativity (1915), which gave us space warps, the Big Bang, and black holes. But many don't realize that his greatest theory was never finished: "a theory of everything". Einstein's crowning achievement was to have been the unified field theory, an attempt to "read the mind of God".

But on the third try, Einstein failed. He spent the last 30 years of his life chasing after an equation, perhaps no more than one inch long, that would explain all physical phenomena. Everything from Creation, to supernovas, to atoms and molecules, perhaps even DNA, people, and love was to be explained by this equation. If discovered, it was to have been the ultimate achievement of 2,000 years of investigation into the nature of space and matter, ever since the Greeks asked what was the smallest particle and the smallest unit of space. Although there are many unresolved questions, today the leading and, in fact, only candidate for the Theory of Everything is ‘superstring’ theory, defined in 10 dimensional hyperspace. Superstring theory, in turn may one day answer some of the deepest questions of the universe, such as:

  • What happened before the big bang?
  • Is it possible to build a time machine?
  • Can we punch a hole in space?
Albert Einstein
CalTech
Albert Einstein never managed to "read the mind of God"

Not only has the power of this theory startled the world of mathematics and shaken the world of physics, it is also the craziest theory ever proposed.

Four fundamental forces

Today, we realize that the entire universe is governed by four fundamental forces:

  • The gravitational force, which keeps us from flying into outer space, and prevents our sun (a gigantic hydrogen bomb) from exploding outward.
  • The electromagnetic force, which light up our cities and energizes our lasers and our computers.
  • The strong and weak nuclear forces, which lights up the stars and galaxies.

Gravity can be described by Einstein's general relativity theory. Matter warps the space surround it, thereby creating the "force" of gravity.

Imagine an ant walking on a crumpled sheet of paper. The ant would say that there was a mysterious "force" which pulled it left and right. But we know that there is no "force" pulling the ant; there is only the crumpled sheet of paper pushing the ant left and right. Gravity does not pull: empty space pushes.

 
Have your say
 
Regarding the previous comment - yes, there could have been more than one Big Bang in the past where other universes were created in a string of Big Bangs preceding ours. BUT only if they had specific conditions which ensured that they contracted back in on themselves. As well, some theorists believe it possible that the centre of a super-dense black hole can warp space to such an extent that it 'breaks through' to a '10 dimensional hyperspace' and then may create a new Big Bang in another part of this hyperspace, thus producing a new universe. Regarding anti-matter, these particles do exist in nature - but with nowhere near the frequency of 'normal' matter. Each type of common particle has an equivalent 'anti-particle'. (eg. protons and anti-protons) Both matter and anti-matter were formed in the Big Bang. Cosmologists believe that they annihilated each other and that there was a remaining amount of 'normal' matter which formed the universe we see today.
Posted by: Editor - 2008-01-16 - 20:16 GMT

Do you think its possible that there has been more than one big bang, that its a re-occuring super-event? Also i was wondering about antimatter do you think its possible that maybe it lies in the center of everything? Like the universe, planets, or maybe even us?
Posted by: bjohnson89 - 2008-01-16 - 19:54 GMT

One thing troubles me,that if every thing began at time t0, then how do we account for the difference in age of galaxies, stars etc.?
Posted by: gopalanand - 2008-01-11 - 17:25 GMT

Post new comment
Please copy the 5 symbols from this security code image into the box below to submit comment.

I agree to terms and conditions       
 
FirstScience.com

About | Privacy policy | Terms & conditions
© 1995-2008 All rights reserved

Download Science TV about Big Theories
Related articles
Extreme Maths: Infinity - The Art of the Infinite
The true mysteries of mathematics lie at the limits of our...
A Brief History of Infinity
The paradoxical twists and turns of infinity have baffled many...
Related video
Try these books...
Superstrings: A Theory of Everything? (Canto)
$23.99
$18.95
>More Info
THEORIES OF EVERYTHING: THE QUEST FOR ULTIMATE EXPLANATION.
>More Info
Latest News
> Find 1000s more science gadgets & gizmos