|
October 22 marked the anniversary of
the flu pandemic of 1918 which spread globally in little over a year
and killed at least 50 million people. Commonly referred to as
Spanish flu, the illness caused more deaths than World War I or the
four years of Bubonic plague outbreak in the Middle Ages. Now,
almost 80 years later, medicine has advanced significantly, yet the
threat of pandemic flu is still very real. Last year, fear of a bird
flu epidemic dominated news headlines as a number of humans in
different regions were infected with the virus after being in close
proximity to infected birds. If the virus were to mutate and become
transmittable from person to person, a flu pandemic could emerge
with effects just as catastrophic as the mass flu outbreak of 1918.
New strains of flu are the most likely to cause epidemics, but how
do they come about? When the proteins (or antigens) on the surface
of a flu virus change frequently, different strains of flu are
created with new variations of surface proteins. Although
differences between strains are usually relatively minor,
occasionally major changes to the proteins will occur which can
result in a virulent strain that causes pandemic flu. The population
will have little or no immunity to such a new strain and this makes
the virus more likely to spread quickly from person to person. With
common flu, for example, a new flu vaccine is required each year
since immunity to one strain will not necessarily provide immunity
to other similar strains.
New vaccines
Developing a vaccine for a new strain can take time. Dr. Jim
Robertson, principal scientist at the National Institute for
Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) in the UK, predicts that
today, the complex genetic task of developing a suitable vaccine
would take 1-2 months alone and producing it, a further 4-5 months.
The reality is therefore that a pandemic flu could progress
unopposed for up to six months. Furthermore, in a pandemic situation
it is likely that two doses of vaccine would be required for it to
be effective. Experts claim that it is inevitable that vaccines
would be limited during the first year of an outbreak, which would
cause the ethical dilemma of deciding who should be administered the
vaccine first.
Assuming such medication would actually work on a pandemic strain of
flu virus, Dr. Catherine Macken at Los Alamos National Laboratory in
New Mexico has stated that antiviral medication can only abate the
spread of infection and cannot provide any long-term immunity.
Antiviral drugs act on viruses in a similar way to how antibiotics
act on bacteria: as soon as treatment ceases, the risk of infection
is restored. The limited supply and expiry date of these drugs would
only act to defer a pandemic rather than deter it.
Preventing a pandemic
Experts are already thinking ahead and taking preventative measures.
The World Health Organisation Global Influenza Surveillance Network
is a network of laboratories worldwide that perform genetic analyses
of around 2000 flu viruses each year to monitor and detect the
emergence of new viruses. This allows early detection of strains
that could cause pandemics and enables the development of new
vaccines every year that are specific to the new strains.
By studying strains of flu that caused pandemics in the past,
researchers may also gain some useful insight into the virus. On
17th October 2006, The National Institute of Health in the U.S.
advised that federal scientists led by Dr. Gary Nabel at Vaccine
Research Center at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases (NIAID) had developed a vaccine that provided mice with
immunity against the strain of the 1918 flu virus. “Understanding
why this influenza virus was so deadly is an extremely important
question”, says NIAID director Anthony S. Fauci. “By building upon
earlier research where scientists successfully reconstructed the
1918 pandemic flu strain, Dr. Nabel and his colleagues have
demonstrated that this virus is vulnerable to intervention. This
knowledge will help further our continued efforts to develop
treatments and vaccines to protect us against another deadly flu
pandemic.”
In the meantime, what we can do is increase awareness. Global
surveillance schemes and international sharing of information should
help governments stay informed and give them time to plan
appropriately. When a threat is imminent, strict detection methods
should be swiftly implemented at ports of entry, and in high-risk
public places like hospitals, so as to prevent as much as possible
the spread of infection into new regions. Most importantly,
preparing the population through education and awareness campaigns
will mean that everyone knows what symptoms to look out for and how
to respond efficiently and most of all, without panicking.
|