PET imaging may not improve diagnostic accuracy in early head and neck cancer
- 13 May 2008The editorialists contend, however, that clinicians typically use one or more diagnostic imaging techniques, as well as clinical examinations, to assemble an overall picture of their patient’s disease and do not rely on a single test. Therefore, comparing one imaging technique against another may not adequately capture the possible benefit gained from an approach. “Prospective data remain a critical necessity to translate imaging improvements with FDG-PET into proven treatment improvements,” the editorialists write.
Contact:
- Article: John Ioannidis, , 302651097807
- Editorial: Julie Penne, , (713) 792-0662
Citation:
- Article: Kyzas PA, Evangelou E, Denaxa-Kyra D, Ioannidis JPA. 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography to Evaluate Cervical Node Metastases in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100: 712-720
- Editorial: Schwartz DL, Macapinlac HA, Weber RS. FDG-PET Staging of Head and Neck Cancer — Can Improved Imaging Lead to Improved Treatment" J Natl Cancer Inst 2008; 100: 688-689
Note to Reporters:
We have started up an e-mail list to alert reporters when papers are available on the EurekAlert site. If you would be interested on being on this list, please let us know at . The content will continue to be available through EurekAlert’s e-mail system and our EurekAlert page.
The Journal of the National Cancer Institute is published by Oxford University Press and is not affiliated with the National Cancer Institute. Attribution to the Journal of the National Cancer Institute is requested in all news coverage. Visit the Journal online at http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/.






Please copy the 5 symbols from this security code image into the box below to submit comment.






