ADVERTISMENT
 
 
4 Jul 2008

Are we Alone In The Universe?

- 10 Aug 2004
By Sir Martin Rees, Astronomer Royal   
Page 6 of 7

The cosmos confronted with huge spans of time, as well as stupendous expanses of space. Life on Earth has evolved for billions of years, but our Sun has burnt up less than half its fuel, and will keep shining for another five billion years. If life isn't prematurely snuffed out, our remote progeny will surely -- in the aeons that lie ahead -- spread far beyond this planet.

We plainly can't forecast the vastly remote future. But what might happen in the first decades of the new millennium? How long will it be before people return to the Moon, and perhaps explore still further afield?

International Space Station
NASA

Worth its weight in gold - a section of the International Space Station


The centerpiece of the current US programme is the new International Space Station: this will be in orbit a few hundred miles up, and the size of a football field. It will be the most expensive artifact ever constructed, costing its own weight in gold. Even if it is finished -- something that seems uncertain, given the immense and ever-rising costs, and prolonged delays -- it will be neither practical nor inspiring. Thirty years after men walked on the Moon, a new generation of astronauts will be going round and round the Earth, in more comfort than Mir can offer, but much more expensively. The astronauts will be able to do experiments, but most of those could be done more cheaply by robots in smaller free-flying satellites.

The Space Station would make somewhat more sense as a staging post on the way to other planets. But no such follow-up will materialise unless public enthusiasm revives, or unless some technical breakthrough renders space travel much cheaper and easier than it now seems.

Present launching techniques are as extravagant as air travel would be if the plane had to be rebuilt after every flight. Spaceflight will only be affordable when it adopts the same techniques as supersonic aircraft. Tourist trips into orbit may then become routine. And wealthy adventurers may boldly go further. Future Richard Bransons, for whom round-the-world ballooning seems too tame and routine, could aim for the Moon. If Bill Gates seeks a challenge that won't make his later life seem an anticlimax, he could sponsor the first expedition to Mars.

 
Have your say
 
It's quite scary to think that we might be alone, but then again we might not be, for all we know our species came too late. Perhaps long long ago there was life everywhere but until we find evidence of life I will just stick with my theory that we should carry on searching (if you catch my drift).
Posted by: theoreticperson - 2008-05-27 - 17:16 GMT

I don't know if we are alone or not, but I know there is a vast space out there. I hate to think that only we are using it - what a waste if we are the only ones.
Posted by: guest - 2008-05-12 - 12:05 GMT

My own theory is this:
There is something bigger than us but we are too small to see it. Take a good example: from the invention of the microscope we are able to see microscopic life. We are part of another microscopic life of ag reater magnitude such as the Universe. We are trying do decipher something so big that we still have a lot of questions.
Jaime F. Navarro

Posted by: Fernixx - 2008-05-12 - 12:05 GMT

Post new comment
Please copy the 5 symbols from this security code image into the box below to submit comment.

I agree to terms and conditions       
 
FirstScience.com

About | Privacy policy | Terms & conditions
© 1995-2008 All rights reserved

Try these books...
Astronomical Enigmas: Life on Mars, the Star of Bethlehem, and Other Milky Way Mysteries
$29.95
>More Info
The Search for Life on Mars
$16.50
>More Info
Latest News
> Find 1000s more science gadgets & gizmos