ADVERTISMENT
 
 
4 Jul 2009

The History of the Black Death

- 10 Aug 2004
By Christopher Duncan and Susan Scott   
Page 2 of 5

The epidemics progressively increased in spread, frequency and ferocity with a marked rise after 1550 because transport improved and the population of the towns steadily grew, thereby providing an ever-increasing pool of potential victims.

Combatting an Infectious Disease

The Italian Health Authorities were at the forefront of trying to control this infectious disease and, even in the fourteenth century and with no medical knowledge, had accurately established a quarantine period of 40 days. This became the gold standard for medical practice and proved to be completely reliable for the following 300 years. This epic discovery demonstrates that the pestilence (as the plagues were called) was directly infectious and was transmitted from one person to another.

Towns in France gradually realised that the danger lay in the arrival of an infected traveller who may well have come from a considerable distance. Entry was denied if they had come from a town that had suffered an outbreak. Once an epidemic had erupted, those displaying symptoms were removed to emergency primitive isolation hospitals that were hurriedly erected outside the town. Once a plague case had been identified, the family was locked up in the house, the well-known cross was daubed on the door and a watchman was appointed to stand guard.

In spite of only sketchy medical knowledge, the epidemiology of the plague was fully understood by the 17th century. Daniel Defoe had perspicaciously noted that, in the Great Plague of London in 1665, ‘because of its infectious nature, the disease may be spread by apparently healthy people who harbour the disease but have not yet exhibited the symptoms. Such a person was in fact a poisoner, a walking destroyer perhaps for a week or a fortnight before his death, who might have ruined those that he would have hazarded his life to save… breathing death upon them, even perhaps his tender kissing and embracings of his own children.’

Bubonic Plague

It is clear, therefore, that throughout the Age of Plagues, the disease was correctly recognised as a directly infectious disease and this belief continued until the end of the 19th Century. Why then is it popularly assumed that these devastating epidemics were outbreaks of bubonic plague, a disease that is spread to humans by rats and fleas? This bacterial disease had been grumbling in Asia for centuries, but in the 1890s it erupted violently and caused grievous loss of life. Steamships then carried infected rats and fleas from the infested warehouses of the Chinese ports to many of the warmer parts of the world, wherever suitable rodent hosts could be found, and the pandemic of the 20th Century had begun.

 
Have your say
 
Disgusting! eww
Posted by: guest - 2009-05-20 - 09:38 GMT

What is a black plague?
Posted by: guest - 2009-05-20 - 09:33 GMT

this is weird
Posted by: guest - 2009-04-27 - 13:22 GMT

Post new comment
Please copy the 5 symbols from this security code image into the box below to submit comment.

I agree to terms and conditions       
 
FirstScience.com

About | Privacy policy | Terms & conditions
© 1995-2009 All rights reserved

Related articles
The Black Death - Modern Nightmare?
Could the Black Death return and become a modern killing...
Flu Pandemics - Are we due for another one?
Eighty years after the flu pandemic of 1918, the...
The Black Death - Black Death Plague Facts and Trivia
This week on the site we have another FirstScience Exclusive...
Try these books...
A Brief History of Disease, Science and Medicine
$29.95
>More Info
Killer Germs
$17.95
$12.21
>More Info
Latest News
> Find 1000s more science gadgets & gizmos