ADVERTISMENT
 
 
21 Nov 2009

Terraforming Mars

- 6 Jan 2001
By Dr Tony Philips   
Page 1 of 2

Artificial greenhouse gases that are bad news on Earth could provide the means to make Mars a more comfortable place for humans to live.

To say that Mars is a chilly place would be an understatement. The Red Planet's mean annual temperature is 55 degrees C below zero - that's about the same as the temperature of Earth's south pole during winter.

If humans ever build communities on Mars, they might want to find a way to turn up the global thermostat. At a NASA-sponsored conference, "The Physics and Biology of Making Mars Habitable", scientists discussed ways that future colonists might make the frigid planet a little more comfortable.

One solution might be to pump enough greenhouse gases into the Martian atmosphere to create a runaway greenhouse effect. Here on Earth, the idea of a runaway greenhouse sets off alarm bells. But on Mars it could be a plus. Scientists at the conference speculated how it might be possible to warm Mars just enough to evaporate the planet's available carbon dioxide (CO2 trapped in ices and frost) into the atmosphere, where such gases could contribute to keeping the planet warm.

But there are two problems. First, even if all of Mars's available CO2 were coaxed into the atmosphere, it wouldn't necessarily warm the planet enough to make it a comfortable place for humans, because no one knows just how much CO2 is there. Second, the best way to get Mars to release its CO2 spontaneously is, well... to warm it up. It's a "Catch-22" situation!

image

Sunlight is absorbed by a planet's surface, which then radiates warming infrared energy into the atmosphere. Greenhouse gases prevent that energy from escaping into space.

Margarita Marinova, an undergraduate student at MIT, believes she has an answer to both problems. Use artificially created perfluorocarbons (PFCs) to initiate the planetary warming process. Marinova has been studying the warming effects of PFCs, in collaboration with Chris McKay, a member of the NASA Astrobiology Institute at the Ames Research Centre. McKay was one of the organisers of the terraforming conference where Marinova presented her research.

PFCs have several advantages. First, they are super-greenhouse gases. A little bit does a lot of warming. Second, PFCs have a very long lifetime. This causes serious problems on Earth, but their longevity would be a positive factor on Mars. Third, they do not have any negative effects on living organisms.

 
Have your say
 
These ideas may work for a time, but are inadequate in terms of long-term human habitation. Since Mars has a negligible magnetic field to protect it from the solar wind, the atmosphere would soon be stripped off the planet again. An atmosphere would most likely need to be created mostly from extramartian sources, such as comets.
Posted by: guest - 2009-05-20 - 09:40 GMT

GREAT!!!!!!! :)
Posted by: guest - 2009-05-20 - 09:25 GMT

Hi People of Earth - I'm from Mars
Posted by: guest - 2009-03-12 - 21:45 GMT

I understand that we may be killing our own planet, but does that give us the right to move onto another one? And in the process of evolution, we may end up playing god (figuratively) and creating thousands of new species, and who knows what may come of that.
Despite all this, I think it would be very interesting to find out. =D

Posted by: guest - 2009-02-17 - 12:57 GMT

Terraforming on Mars would be fun, but isn't there the chance of us killing Mars just like we are doing to Earth?
Posted by: guest - 2008-12-11 - 15:38 GMT

Good text.
Posted by: guest - 2008-10-22 - 11:23 GMT

Take that, crazy people who believe in god!
Posted by: guest - 2008-10-11 - 13:08 GMT

Changing the atmosphere on Mars to make it habitable would be the greatest thing that man would have ever achieved.
It would be a milestone in technological advancement and increase our understanding of Earth in the process.
It is time we start to look at this even more seriously than we are currently.
To create an environment on Mars with animals, plants, insects and fish and the actual process of the transformation would benefit man greatly. In our endeavour to learn more about Earth and the causes of our global warming which is considered a crisis currently, the Mars outcome could help/teach us how we could reverse these effects on Earth which I feel are important issues which could be addressed.

I am not to keen on a full-blown human colony being introduced to Mars but it would be great to see a wild life sanctuary created to protect natural resources we have here on Earth.
An insurance policy if you will.

Maybe we can do good for a change, creating a positive outcome while doing this and create new technologies in the process and conduct new scientific research at the same time.

I am pro Mars terraforming and keen to see a project started which could benefit us all in the future. Hey ok the initial costs would be high but there are so many billions of dollars misappropriated currently, maybe it would be wiser to invest in something like this to aid us all rather than some smart weapon which is only used against our fellow man.

GO MARS!!!

Posted by: Baynne - 2008-09-22 - 10:26 GMT

Why why why?
Posted by: guest - 2008-07-22 - 16:47 GMT

There's just no way I can believe that it would take 2 centuries to heat Mars up. Technology doesn't just keep getting better, the rate of which it does is escalating, plus humanity does increase in population - i.e research will go faster and faster.

I'd guess Mars will be habitable within one century if humanity doesn't kill itself before that :P

Posted by: guest - 2008-05-12 - 12:01 GMT

Post new comment
Please copy the 5 symbols from this security code image into the box below to submit comment.

I agree to terms and conditions       
 
FirstScience.com

About | Privacy policy | Terms & conditions
© 1995-2009 All rights reserved

Latest News
> Find 1000s more science gadgets & gizmos