Interview: James Lovelock on Climate Change
- 2 Feb 2007FS: Could renewable energy be the solution?
Hydroelectricity plant in Buskerud, Norway.
JL: I think that the so-called alternative energy schemes like wind and solar power are pretty inefficient and impractical. They are no solution to our problems at the moment, and I think they are dreamt up by urban people who want to do something natural.
There are some natural power sources, like hydroelectricity, that are excellent. Norway largely runs on hydroelectricity, but the sad thing is, weve used about all we can, there isnt any left to spare. One day, we might be able to get energy from tidal sources and I do wish the British government had the sense to build the Severn barrage, a power scheme across the estuary of the River Severn in western Britain that would provide the output of four major nuclear power stations. There were too many arguments about doing it and Im afraid the Greens were the main objectors: they thought it would upset a wild fowl habitat somewhere, so it wasnt done.
FS: Do you think that we will ever be able to control our climate?
JL: As a scientist, and one who used to read science fiction, that question really fascinates me. There are a lot of proposals up at the moment: some colleagues of mine at NASA in the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory have a very reasonable scheme for putting up sunshades in space. It would be at the gravity-neutral point between the Earth and the Sun, so it wouldnt take much effort to hold it there, and would involve a large carbon-fibred diaphragm at least ten miles in diameter. They say it would cost less than the space station and would disperse about two percent of sunlight coming in, which would relieve us of global heating. It would take a lot of time and a lot of politics to get it working, but it might happen.




I don’t think any one person has done more to start the current debate on Global Warming - so thank you. It is now fairly universally agreed that that we must reduce emissions and serious efforts are starting. Inevitably this will take time that we haven’t got!
In the meantime I believe we must control the temperature rise if at all possible. My suggestion goes as follows:
-- for the past 250 years there have been good global temperature records.
-- during this time there have been 13 major volcanic eruptions.
-- in the subsequent two years there has always been a reduction in global temperatures.
-- this reduction is sufficient to completely counteract global warming.
-- the cooling results from volcanic products in the stratosphere (above 30,000 ft.)
-- these microscopic products persist for one to two years in the stratosphere.
-- there are hundreds of commercial aircraft cruising around the world in the lower stratosphere.
-- it is perfectly feasible to put an additive in aircraft fuel to simulate the products of a volcanic eruption.
I have been proposing and researching this idea for the past year including detailed proposals on the chemicals to be added to the fuel. See www.naturaljointmobility.info/globalwarming.htm
I hope you agree that it deserves to be brought into the debate that is positively raging at the moment.
I will be happy to propose and defend this idea anywhere, anytime.
I hope to hear from you.
John Gorman.
Posted by: johngorman - 2007-02-12 - 10:26 GMT


Please copy the 5 symbols from this security code image into the box below to submit comment.












