ADVERTISMENT
 
 
8 Nov 2009

Interview: James Lovelock on Climate Change

- 2 Feb 2007
By Christine Carter   
Page 3 of 5

I think that nuclear energy has to evolve in the way all energy systems evolve, and I’m very pleased to see that the latest nuclear plants (one is now being built in South Africa) are small scale plants that provide just enough electricity for a small region. They are the so-called pebble bed reactors: they’re quite small, quite safe and very suitable. We should remember that the very first nuclear reactors that supplied energy were built in Britain in the 1950’s in three and a half years. One or two of them are still working.

FS: But what about the problem of nuclear waste?

JL: Personally, and I’m supported in this by no less a dignitary than Hans Blix, what’s all this fuss about nuclear waste? There’s hardly any, and that is the point.

Last Christmas, my wife and I were invited to Sellafield, which is the British depository of nuclear waste. We walked around the plant and found that the radiation level (which I measured with a handheld monitor of mine, not one that had been supplied) was about the same as it is here, in other words, completely safe. Around the building, where 40 years of all of Britain’s civil and military nuclear waste was stored, the radiation level rose to just above that in the streets of St Ives, which is still absolutely harmless although it happens to be in a rather uranium-rich area. All of the waste in that building, and it wasn’t a very large building, is in the form of blocks of glass that have been fused. If you froze or fixed the carbon dioxide waste we produce each year into something like magnesium carbonate, it would make a mountain one mile high and 12 miles in circumference every year. Now that is truly deadly and will kill nearly all of us if we go on doing it.

FS: Could nuclear power be used for transport?

JL: If you go to France and much of Europe, you are riding in trains that are powered by nuclear electricity. The French have been very sensible, they run almost everything on nuclear energy. The very Greens who scream about its dangers are mostly wealthy people who have second homes in France, but they don’t seem to notice this, such is the perversity of people.

You couldn’t have a nuclear-powered car with a nuclear motor in it, but what you can do is run it on batteries. It won’t be long before all cars are running on batteries that can be charged from nuclear electricity. Planes will take longer.

 
Have your say
 
I totally agree!
Posted by: Toni - 2008-10-11 - 13:08 GMT

Dear James Lovelock,

I don’t think any one person has done more to start the current debate on Global Warming - so thank you. It is now fairly universally agreed that that we must reduce emissions and serious efforts are starting. Inevitably this will take time that we haven’t got!

In the meantime I believe we must control the temperature rise if at all possible. My suggestion goes as follows:

-- for the past 250 years there have been good global temperature records.
-- during this time there have been 13 major volcanic eruptions.
-- in the subsequent two years there has always been a reduction in global temperatures.
-- this reduction is sufficient to completely counteract global warming.
-- the cooling results from volcanic products in the stratosphere (above 30,000 ft.)
-- these microscopic products persist for one to two years in the stratosphere.
-- there are hundreds of commercial aircraft cruising around the world in the lower stratosphere.
-- it is perfectly feasible to put an additive in aircraft fuel to simulate the products of a volcanic eruption.

I have been proposing and researching this idea for the past year including detailed proposals on the chemicals to be added to the fuel. See www.naturaljointmobility.info/globalwarming.htm
I hope you agree that it deserves to be brought into the debate that is positively raging at the moment.
I will be happy to propose and defend this idea anywhere, anytime.

I hope to hear from you.

John Gorman.

Posted by: johngorman - 2007-02-12 - 10:26 GMT

Post new comment
Please copy the 5 symbols from this security code image into the box below to submit comment.

I agree to terms and conditions       
 
FirstScience.com

About | Privacy policy | Terms & conditions
© 1995-2009 All rights reserved

Related articles
Sustainable nuclear energy moves a step closer
Sustainable nuclear energy moves a step closer   In future a...
Global warming of the future is projected by ancient carbon emissions
Global warming of the future is projected by ancient carbon...
A Glacial Warning
Glaciers in Uganda, East Africa are receding at an alarming...
Going Green: On Earth and Beyond
Scientists are now looking at how research into space can...
Try these books...
Latest News
> Find 1000s more science gadgets & gizmos