ADVERTISMENT
 
 
21 Nov 2009

The Theory of Everything

- 6 Jan 2001
By Michio Kaku   
Page 1 of 5

Time Magazine chose him as Man of the Century. Albert Einstein had three great theories. His first theory of Special Relativity (1905) gave us E = mc², which led to the atomic bomb and unlocked the secret of the stars. His second great theory was General Relativity (1915), which gave us space warps, the Big Bang, and black holes. But many don't realize that his greatest theory was never finished: "a theory of everything". Einstein's crowning achievement was to have been the unified field theory, an attempt to "read the mind of God".

But on the third try, Einstein failed. He spent the last 30 years of his life chasing after an equation, perhaps no more than one inch long, that would explain all physical phenomena. Everything from Creation, to supernovas, to atoms and molecules, perhaps even DNA, people, and love was to be explained by this equation. If discovered, it was to have been the ultimate achievement of 2,000 years of investigation into the nature of space and matter, ever since the Greeks asked what was the smallest particle and the smallest unit of space. Although there are many unresolved questions, today the leading and, in fact, only candidate for the Theory of Everything is ‘superstring’ theory, defined in 10 dimensional hyperspace. Superstring theory, in turn may one day answer some of the deepest questions of the universe, such as:

  • What happened before the big bang?
  • Is it possible to build a time machine?
  • Can we punch a hole in space?
Albert Einstein
CalTech
Albert Einstein never managed to "read the mind of God"

Not only has the power of this theory startled the world of mathematics and shaken the world of physics, it is also the craziest theory ever proposed.

Four fundamental forces

Today, we realize that the entire universe is governed by four fundamental forces:

  • The gravitational force, which keeps us from flying into outer space, and prevents our sun (a gigantic hydrogen bomb) from exploding outward.
  • The electromagnetic force, which light up our cities and energizes our lasers and our computers.
  • The strong and weak nuclear forces, which lights up the stars and galaxies.

Gravity can be described by Einstein's general relativity theory. Matter warps the space surround it, thereby creating the "force" of gravity.

Imagine an ant walking on a crumpled sheet of paper. The ant would say that there was a mysterious "force" which pulled it left and right. But we know that there is no "force" pulling the ant; there is only the crumpled sheet of paper pushing the ant left and right. Gravity does not pull: empty space pushes.

 
Have your say
 
You are the reason why
Posted by: guest - 2009-05-20 - 09:57 GMT

Big Crush Big Bang... tell us something new. The question is not what....

it.s why?

Posted by: guest - 2009-03-12 - 21:50 GMT

The primary problem in identifying a "theory of everything" is resolving the anomalies we observe. I have completed a treatise that focuses on four momentum anomalies: the slowing rotation of the Earth, the increasing altitude of the Moon, the slowing of the Pioneer space probes and the rotational velocities of galaxies. The research unveils a deeper understanding of gravity, space and matter. The paper can be viewed at www.dynamicmatter.com
Posted by: jbh - 2009-03-12 - 21:46 GMT

There has to be a beginning to the Big Bang. What caused it and how? That's a pretty good theory, but how did that start from nothing? Did it just happen? And how does that happen by God clapping his hands?
Posted by: guest - 2009-02-17 - 12:12 GMT

I say that classical gravity can be a beginning of the unification of quantum mechanics and relativity because both are extensions of classical mechanics only.
Posted by: guest - 2009-02-05 - 16:10 GMT

I think that the Big Bang was just one of many many billions of big bangs, the black hole the first ever black hole to burn up and shrink to a tiny dense mass and explode after the Big Bang as we know it, and if you could rewind time that black hole would eventually lead back to a star and a planet revolving and eventually falling into that star, then back to the actual Big Bang theory as we know it. So if you keep going back in time that tiny atom-sized heavy mass that exploded as the Big Bang as we know it, was the end of a burning shrinking earlier super super massive black hole. So in the future billions of years there will be many more even bigger black holes that will burn shrink and explode adding greatly to the Universe, till one day there will be many super super massive black holes that will merge with other super super massive black holes and eventualy swallow the entire Universe, burn, shrink and eventually again explode. This will begin the cycle over once again, as in the Big Bang as we know it today, in another words this will be a renewing of the Universe. And it begins again, so possibly no beginning to the Universe just a revolving door Universe.No begining and no end
Posted by: naslund26 - 2009-01-09 - 18:50 GMT

Before the big bang theory there was nothing, and then god clapped his hands
Posted by: jiriki - 2009-01-06 - 17:18 GMT

I can honestly answer 2 of the 3 micro questions given as examples of questions which would be answered by the theory of everything. I cannot however answer the first one... what happened before the Big Bang. No-one will EVER know the answer to that one, as nothing existed before the Big Bang. Only theology can answer that one... a creator of some sort unimaginable by a human to EVER comprehend.
Posted by: theoracle - 2008-12-13 - 15:55 GMT

I believe that it is individualism that creates our own realities. That has no scientific outcome.
Posted by: chick - 2008-12-02 - 11:38 GMT

There is no theory. Everything is relative to the individual. I can choose not to write. a particle, quark, whatever is always divisible. Why do scientists not see. Einstein was a genius for this Earth, but not the Universe.
Posted by: dawnbartle - 2008-12-02 - 11:37 GMT

Schrodinger was wrong, there are many other outcomes
Posted by: guest - 2008-12-02 - 11:32 GMT

Could this explain what happens to mortals after "death"? Do we travel into another universe? Since matter is neither created nor destroyed then it follows that we get transformed to another "place"?
Posted by: guest - 2008-11-13 - 16:50 GMT

i agreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Posted by: chetu08 - 2008-10-11 - 13:03 GMT

Yes I do agree and would love to be updated on the theory
Posted by: ladi - 2008-09-22 - 10:25 GMT

Michio Kaku really knows how to make physics interesting. But it still bugs my mind that we can really read the mind of God through the so called "theory of everything".
Posted by: guest - 2008-09-22 - 10:19 GMT

in regards to the universe being about 14 billion years old, is that long or short scale? And 14 thousand million could likely be 1 millisecond in a "universe day"
Am I just another dumb animal?

Posted by: hankhonker - 2008-08-18 - 12:54 GMT

Regarding the previous comment - yes, there could have been more than one Big Bang in the past where other universes were created in a string of Big Bangs preceding ours. BUT only if they had specific conditions which ensured that they contracted back in on themselves. As well, some theorists believe it possible that the centre of a super-dense black hole can warp space to such an extent that it 'breaks through' to a '10 dimensional hyperspace' and then may create a new Big Bang in another part of this hyperspace, thus producing a new universe. Regarding anti-matter, these particles do exist in nature - but with nowhere near the frequency of 'normal' matter. Each type of common particle has an equivalent 'anti-particle'. (eg. protons and anti-protons) Both matter and anti-matter were formed in the Big Bang. Cosmologists believe that they annihilated each other and that there was a remaining amount of 'normal' matter which formed the universe we see today.
Posted by: Editor - 2008-01-16 - 20:16 GMT

Do you think its possible that there has been more than one big bang, that its a re-occuring super-event? Also i was wondering about antimatter do you think its possible that maybe it lies in the center of everything? Like the universe, planets, or maybe even us?
Posted by: bjohnson89 - 2008-01-16 - 19:54 GMT

One thing troubles me,that if every thing began at time t0, then how do we account for the difference in age of galaxies, stars etc.?
Posted by: gopalanand - 2008-01-11 - 17:25 GMT

We would already know if we are going to discover the mysteries of time travel because people would be coming back to the present from the future!
Posted by: junesongprovision - 2008-01-04 - 16:58 GMT

Looking at the heirarchy of subjects one finds that what cannot be explained at a certain macro level is explained at next micro level.Is it possible that we should look to still smaller levels in our search for TOE(and not just to next number of dimensions
Posted by: Manyasha - 2008-01-04 - 16:57 GMT

Where do I start?
Posted by: Reece - 2007-02-28 - 17:48 GMT

Post new comment
Please copy the 5 symbols from this security code image into the box below to submit comment.

I agree to terms and conditions       
 
FirstScience.com

About | Privacy policy | Terms & conditions
© 1995-2009 All rights reserved

Related articles
Extreme Maths: Infinity - The Art of the Infinite
The true mysteries of mathematics lie at the limits of our...
A Brief History of Infinity
The paradoxical twists and turns of infinity have baffled many...
Try these books...
Latest News
> Find 1000s more science gadgets & gizmos