ADVERTISMENT
 
 
22 May 2008

The Theory of Everything

- 6 Jan 2001
By Michio Kaku   
Page 3 of 5
image
CERN
Even particles leave tracks in the BEBC (Big European Bubble Chamber)

Superstrings and the 10th Dimension

Superstring theory combines relativity and quantum in an elegant, intuitive way. First, it describes the myriad of quantum particles of nature because each particle represents a "note" on a vibrating string. Think of a violin string. No one says that A or B is more fundamental than C. What is fundamental is the string itself.

Superstring theory says that, if we had a supermicroscope and could peer at an electron, we would see a string vibrating in a certain mode. The string is extremely small (10 to the minus 33 centimeters!) so that the electron looks like a point particle to us. If we shake the string, so it vibrates in a different mode, then the electron can turn into something else, such as a quark, the fundamental constitute of protons and neutrons. Shake it again, and the string could vibrate in the mode which describes photons (the quanta of light). Shake it again and it turns into a graviton (the quanta of gravity).

In fact, the collective set of vibrations corresponds to the entire spectrum of known particles. Instead of postulating millions of different particles, one only has to postulate a single object, the superstring. The sub-atomic particles are notes on the superstring. Our bodies are symphonies of strings, and the laws of physics are the laws of harmony of the superstring.

The superstring theory can also explain gravity. When the superstring moves in space and time, splitting and rejoining into other strings, it forces the space-time surrounding it to curl up, just as Einstein's equations predict. In other words, even if Einstein never dreamed up general relativity, we might have discovered it through superstring theory.

image
CERN
Dimensions in the quantum world: the decay of a kaon leaves tracks behind it

Hyperspace

Superstring theory, of course, has its detractors. Many point out it predicts the universe is defined in 10 dimensional hyperspace, which sounds more like science fiction than real physics. It's indisputable that the universe exists in four dimensions (3 spatial dimensions and one time dimension). Every object in the universe, from the tip of your nose to the farthest star, can be located by giving just 3 co-ordinates (length, width, and height). If we also give the time, then we can describe every event in the universe with just four numbers. For example in New York, we might say to a friend, "meet me at 42nd street and 5th avenue, on the 25th floor, at 12:00." Thus, four numbers (42,5,25,12) completely specifies this event in space-time.

 
Have your say
 
Regarding the previous comment - yes, there could have been more than one Big Bang in the past where other universes were created in a string of Big Bangs preceding ours. BUT only if they had specific conditions which ensured that they contracted back in on themselves. As well, some theorists believe it possible that the centre of a super-dense black hole can warp space to such an extent that it 'breaks through' to a '10 dimensional hyperspace' and then may create a new Big Bang in another part of this hyperspace, thus producing a new universe. Regarding anti-matter, these particles do exist in nature - but with nowhere near the frequency of 'normal' matter. Each type of common particle has an equivalent 'anti-particle'. (eg. protons and anti-protons) Both matter and anti-matter were formed in the Big Bang. Cosmologists believe that they annihilated each other and that there was a remaining amount of 'normal' matter which formed the universe we see today.
Posted by: Editor - 2008-01-16 - 20:16 GMT

Do you think its possible that there has been more than one big bang, that its a re-occuring super-event? Also i was wondering about antimatter do you think its possible that maybe it lies in the center of everything? Like the universe, planets, or maybe even us?
Posted by: bjohnson89 - 2008-01-16 - 19:54 GMT

One thing troubles me,that if every thing began at time t0, then how do we account for the difference in age of galaxies, stars etc.?
Posted by: gopalanand - 2008-01-11 - 17:25 GMT

Post new comment
Please copy the 5 symbols from this security code image into the box below to submit comment.

I agree to terms and conditions       
 
FirstScience.com

About | Privacy policy | Terms & conditions
© 1995-2008 All rights reserved

Download Science TV about Big Theories
Related articles
Extreme Maths: Infinity - The Art of the Infinite
The true mysteries of mathematics lie at the limits of our...
A Brief History of Infinity
The paradoxical twists and turns of infinity have baffled many...
Related video
Try these books...
Superstrings: A Theory of Everything? (Canto)
$23.99
$18.95
>More Info
THEORIES OF EVERYTHING: THE QUEST FOR ULTIMATE EXPLANATION.
>More Info
Latest News
> Find 1000s more science gadgets & gizmos