ADVERTISMENT
 
 
21 Nov 2009

The Theory of Everything

- 6 Jan 2001
By Michio Kaku   
Page 2 of 5
Sun
SOHO
The colossal power of a coronal mass ejection from our sun

The other three forces can be described by the quantum theory. The quantum theory has a tortured history. Back in the 1950s, when scores of strange new "fundamental" particles were flooding out of our atom smashers, J. Robert Oppenheimer (father of the atomic bomb) was so frustrated that he declared, "the Nobel Prize in physics shall go to the physicist who does NOT discover a new particle that year." There were so many particles, each given strange Greek names, that Enrico Fermi said, "if I had known there would be so many particles, I would have become a botanist rather than a physicist."

But after decades of wandering in the wilderness (and spending billions of tax payers dollars) physicists have unified these three quantum forces into what is called the Standard Model, based on a zoo of bizarre particles, called quarks, leptons, Higgs bosons, Yang-Mills particles, gluons, W-bosons and more. Remarkably, all known physical phenomenon can, in principle, be described by these two great theories, relativity and the quantum theory.

image
CERN
A segment of the largest tunnel in the world: the LEP particle accelerator

Although these two great theories represent the two pillars upon which ALL physical knowledge is based, the fundamental mystery is why these two theories are so different in almost every way. The first theory is based on the curvature of smooth surfaces, which describes the world of the very large.

The second theory is based on tiny discrete packets of energy (called "quanta") and explains the world of the very small, such as atoms and nuclei.

But why should nature, at the most fundamental level, create two totally dissimilar theories? Sadly, every attempt to merge these two theories has failed. Some of the greatest minds of the century have tackled this problem, only to be unsuccessful.

As physicist Freeman Dyson has pointed out, the road to the unified field theory is "littered with the corpses". Neils Bohr once attended a meeting when Nobel Laureate Wolfgang Pauli was presenting his version of the unified field theory. Bohr stood up and said, "Mr. Pauli, we in the back are all convinced that your theory is crazy. But what divides us is whether your theory is crazy enough!"

This is perhaps the greatest challenge of all time, to unite all four fundamental forces into a consistent, coherent picture. At present, the sole candidate for the theory of everything is superstring theory.

 
Have your say
 
You are the reason why
Posted by: guest - 2009-05-20 - 09:57 GMT

Big Crush Big Bang... tell us something new. The question is not what....

it.s why?

Posted by: guest - 2009-03-12 - 21:50 GMT

The primary problem in identifying a "theory of everything" is resolving the anomalies we observe. I have completed a treatise that focuses on four momentum anomalies: the slowing rotation of the Earth, the increasing altitude of the Moon, the slowing of the Pioneer space probes and the rotational velocities of galaxies. The research unveils a deeper understanding of gravity, space and matter. The paper can be viewed at www.dynamicmatter.com
Posted by: jbh - 2009-03-12 - 21:46 GMT

Post new comment
Please copy the 5 symbols from this security code image into the box below to submit comment.

I agree to terms and conditions       
 
FirstScience.com

About | Privacy policy | Terms & conditions
© 1995-2009 All rights reserved

Related articles
Extreme Maths: Infinity - The Art of the Infinite
The true mysteries of mathematics lie at the limits of our...
A Brief History of Infinity
The paradoxical twists and turns of infinity have baffled many...
Try these books...
Latest News
> Find 1000s more science gadgets & gizmos